Aerial view of Temple of Steps by Sameep Padora & Associates
Aerial view of Temple of Steps by Sameep Padora & Associates
Aerial view of Temple of Steps by Sameep Padora & Associates
The Balaji temple in Nandyal explores and abstracts the long tradition of the temple typology in India.
The architectural philosopher Andrew Benjamin wrote that every act of design was a act of repetition, and that architecture is about exploring what not to repeat. This building too repeats or emulates certain tropes of the Hindu temple so that it is recognisable as a temple yet it doesn’t replicate those tropes but rather breaks them down to constituent parts to then again reconstruct it.
One looks at the relationship of the temple and the kund (stepped water tank), as a contradictory yet complementary one of binary opposites. It is a relationship between a solid and a void, between reaching out to the sky and going deep into the ground about accretion and excavation. This relationship which is so obvious often is unnoticed. Here by employing the same architectural device (steps or corbels), one makes this explicit and yet delightfully abstract. Suddenly, it becomes obvious that the kund (stepped water tank) is the inverted negative of the shikhara (spire) and it leads one to reread this whole dialectic between the two, even in the temples of the past.
Aerial view of Temple of Steps by Sameep Padora & Associates
Aerial view of Temple of Steps by Sameep Padora & Associates
Exterior view of Temple of Steps by Sameep Padora & Associates
Exterior view of Temple of Steps by Sameep Padora & Associates
The use of horizontal layers or corbels is an abstraction of how Hindu temples have employed these corbels to achieve verticality and yet at the Balaji Temple by making the form rise gradually from the ground it destabilised the notion of the temple as a simple figure ground. This gradual rise echo’s perhaps the protohistoric roots of the shikhara (spire) as a simple gravity driven primordial mound/pyramid.
Jacques Herzog talks about how he encountered an architecture in India, which has a very different concept of space. Unlike the western or Islamic project of space where they try to achieve maximum interior spatiality through minimum structure, in India he encountered an architecture where the interiors were almost carved out and the buildings had an intentional heaviness to them. While he was being very facile at some level this ‘weight’ and ‘carved void’ seems to find echo in the Balaji Temple.
Pushkarani of Temple of Steps by Sameep Padora & Associates
Varahaswami Shrine of Temple of Steps by Sameep Padora & Associates
Balaji Shrine of Temple of Steps by Sameep Padora & Associates
Entry of Temple of Steps by Sameep Padora & Associates
Interior view of Temple of Steps by Sameep Padora & Associates
Aerial view of Temple of Steps by Sameep Padora & Associates
Plan with section of Temple of Steps by Sameep Padora & Associates
Plan of Temple of Steps by Sameep Padora & Associates
Section 1 of Temple of Steps by Sameep Padora & Associates
Section 2 of Temple of Steps by Sameep Padora & Associates